Today I had a short but intense
and heartfelt conversation with a colleague about the new common core state
standards. He began by sharing his very short list of those in our ranks he
felt could truly implement the standards in a way that developed a crop of
students with the skills necessary to succeed beyond their high school
experience. Although those identified came as no surprise, for I too had
mentioned these same individuals in another conversation, I was disheartened by
the stark reality that this list represented only 10% of our instructional
staff. With this looming reality before me, I am reminded yet again, “You are
the instructional leader. Now go fix that!”
Go fix the fact that there are so
many who believe that common core is yet another top down idea whose lifespan
will not live beyond the time and energy needed to make the behaviors called
forth by the standards something that students do instinctively and not
haphazardly. Go fix the fact that the profession is riddled with individuals
who see the standards as an instrument used to highlight deficiencies and not
strengths. Go fix the fact that the classroom is a place where every man is an
island and that our schools are not living examples of the environments in
which we say our students will one day work.
And last but not least, go fix the fact that less than 10% of your
highly qualified teachers are prepared to make the pedagogical shift necessary
to prepare our students for the intellectual engagement called forth by the new
standards. Yes, go fix that.
Although the realities presented
above are personal and speak specifically to the truths present in my learning
environment, I believe that one need not look further than the halls of their
own respective institution of learning to see most, if not all of what I have
just described. Nevertheless, it's not enough to be able to identify a problem;
you must be able to solve it.
So how do you begin to address a
problem that does not have a clear cut solution? Hmmm! This sounds awfully
familiar. In fact, it sounds a little bit like Common Core Standard SL.11-12.2
which ask students integrate multiple sources of information presented in
diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to
make informed decisions and solve problems by evaluating the credibility and
accuracy of each source and noting any discrepancies among the data. In other
words, we need to teach our students to do that which we do every single day.
We problem solve, we create and recreate, we research, we analyze, we critique,
we collaborate, we present, we publish, we attempt, we practice, we revisit, we
revise, we study, we take risks etc.
Unfortunately, our students do not,
at least not all of them for they do not live in a time that nurtures such
behaviors. Instead, they live in a world where you can Google the answer to any
question you may have, where sitcoms have problems that are solved within three
commercials, where reality TV and YouTube have made instant celebrities of
individuals with little to no educational pedigree, where the camera and record
button on a Smartphone has made taking notes and or attending to the task at
hand no longer necessary. These are the children sitting before us today and
these my dear colleagues are the children we must teach to do what we do so
instinctively.
So how do you do this? You do
this by being intentional. Being intentional to the point that you slow down
and take notice of the little things you do. For example, this summer I took it
upon myself to read the original version of John Bunyan's Pilgrims Progress.
After reading the first paragraph it soon became apparent to me that I would
not be able to read this book like I had done so many others before this one.
In short, I needed to come up with a strategy that would allow me to access the
text. I wanted to not only comprehend it, but also learn from it. So what did I
do? I went back to the very first word in the paragraph and began to read the
text aloud to myself paying special attention to every single punctuation mark
present. Pausing where I needed to pause and adding emphasis as indicated.
Circling and looking up words that were unfamiliar to me and then rereading the
passage with my new understanding.
Now ask yourself, would your
students have done the same thing? Or would they have simply closed the text
because it was too hard? And would you, like so many of us have done in the
past, simply put on a tape recorder (so that they could at least hear the words
spoken) and told them what it all means? If either one of these options above
ring true for what may happen in your classroom then it's time to make a
change. It's time to develop our students’ patient problem solving ability and
it's time to show them how. This I believe is the charge of the new common core
state standards: that we produce students with the ability to problem-solve, adapt to change, take risk,
communicate effectively, strategically analyze and manage information and ask
the right questions.
"It is time to hold
ourselves and all of our students to a new and higher standard of rigor - one
that is defined according to 21st century criteria. It is time for our
profession to advocate for accountability systems that will enable us to teach
and test the skills that matter most. Our student's futures - and the future of
this great country - are at stake." Tony Wagner, Co-Director of the Change
Leadership Group at the Harvard Graduate School of Education